FindTrial
Sign In

A Study Comparing Jaw and Facial Changes Using One vs. Three Mini-Screws for Support During Orthodontic Treatment

Comparative Cephalometric Assessment of Vertical and Sagittal Changes with Single Versus Three Mini-Implant Anchorage in Patients undergoing Comprehensive Orthodontic Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/108618
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-04-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M261- Anomalies of jaw-cranial base relationship

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

MES DENTAL COLLEGE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients exhibiting Angles Class I malocclusion with anterior maxillary proclination necessitating bilateral extraction of the maxillary first premolars Maxillary incisor display greater than 2mm Presence of an overbite greater than 2mm Good periodontal health with no clinical signs of active gingival or periodontal disease Minimal lower arch crowding

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a history of any kind of trauma or endodontic treatment of the maxillary incisors Patients with congenital abnormalities such as craniofacial syndrome or cleft lip or palate Severe skeletal discrepancies requiring surgical correction Previous history of orthodontic treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the vertical and sagittal cephalometric parameters in Group 1 single midline mini implant before treatment and after space closure To evaluate the vertical and sagittal cephalometric parameters in Group 2 three mini implant anchorage before treatment and after space closure To compare the vertical and sagittal changes observed between the single midline mini implant group and the three mini implant anchorage groupTimepoint: T1 Pre treatment T2 Post retraction—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the vertical and sagittal changes observed between the single midline mini implant group and the three mini implant anchorage groupTimepoint: T1 Pre treatment T2 Post retraction—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR VINCY ANTONY

MES DENTAL COLLEGE

vincyantony2008@yahoo.com9846353153

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026