A study comparing bone changes and patient comfort when dental implants are placed using traditional gum surgery versus a less invasive method

The flapless technique for dental implants A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/04/108563

Enrollment

Registered

2026-04-16

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: FLAP Vs Flapless implant placement: implant placement without rasing the periosteal flap Control Intervention1: SOFT TISSUE PUNCH: SOFT TISSUE PUNCH WILL BE USED INSTEAD OF GIVING CREST

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Single edentulous area of at least 6 7 mm of mesiodistal space. Healthy adjacent teeth (not supporting any fixed prosthesis). Non-smokers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Systemic diseases contraindicating surgery Sites with acute infection Smokers

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Crestal Bone loss Patient reported outcomesTimepoint: BASELINE(T0) 3MONTHS(T1) 6MONTHS(T2)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aena Jain Pundir

RUNGTA COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH,, BHILAI, CHHATTISGARH

draenajain@gmail.com7000835624

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026