FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative Evaluation Of Efficiency Of Canine Retraction Using Two Different Springs In Maxillary Arch

Comparative Assessment Of Efficiency Of Canine Retraction Using Poul Gjessing Spring And T-Loop Retraction Spring In Maxillary Arch- A Split Mouth Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/108532
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-04-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M263- Anomalies of tooth position of fully erupted tooth or teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Poul Gjessing Spring: The participants will be given these spring on one side of maxillary arch for about 4 months for retraction of canine after 1st premolar extraction. Control Interv

Sponsors

Dr Gurjot Singla
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients indicated for bilateral Maxillary first Premolar Extraction 2. Patients with no history of previous orthodontic treatment. 3. Patients with full complement of teeth till first molars. 4. Patients with no history of systemic diseases and trauma. 5. Patients with healthy periodontal status or no active periodontal disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Presence of active periodontal disease. 2. Participants with known systemic disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparative Evaluation Of Efficiency Of Canine Retraction Using Poul Gjessing Spring And T-Loop Retraction Spring In Maxillary ArchTimepoint: Every month till 4 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NilTimepoint: Nil—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Parul Jain

Guru Nanak Dev Dental College and Research

paruldr@gmail.com9815399811

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026