Skip to content

Comparing the Salivary flow rate, pH and Buffer Rate after using two different chewable toothbrushes

Comparative evaluation of two different chewable toothbrushes on the flow rate, pH and Buffering capacity of Saliva- A Randomized Control Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/108528
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-04-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Fuzzy Brush: chewable toothbrush made from biodegradable TPE. Contains ingredients such as xylitol, aromyte and aqua. Patient asked to chew the brush for 2 minutes and the saliva is col

Sponsors

S. Vidyashri
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children between the ages of 9 and 12 years who are in good general and oral health are included, provided that both the child and parent are willing to participate. Participants should have no history of ongoing hospitalization, chronic illness, or continuous use of prescription medications.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children with the presence of orthodontic appliances are excluded, along with those diagnosed with mental or physical health issues and those with motor impairments.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The efficiency of chewable brushes, with and without fluoride, is assessed in relation to salivary flow, salivary pH, and salivary buffer rate. Timepoint: 1 week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVidya S

SRM Kattankulathur Dental College

sv8429@srmist.edu.in7401441335

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026