Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: videolaryngoscope: This study evaluates the use of a videolaryngoscope for placing a breathing tube in adult patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. The videolaryngoscope
Sponsors
Shantabaa Medical College
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: ASA 1 and 2. Mallampati grade 1 and 2. Mouth opening more than 2 finger breath on preanaesthetic assessment. Elective and non emergency surgery requiring GA.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Refusal. Morbid obesity (BMI more than 35 kg/meter square). Coagulopathy or history of anticoagulant use. Pathology of neck, airway or alimentary tract. Pregnant Patients. Patient posted for emergency surgery.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare effectiveness of TAS scope videolaryngoscope and BPL videolaryngoscope in terms of:- 1) Glottic exposure time. (T1) 2) Tube insertion time. (T2) 3) Total duration of intubation. (T1+T2) 4) Number of attempts. (maximum 3) 5) External laryngeal manipulationTimepoint: (T1)- Measured during the laryngoscopy phase, before introduction of the endotracheal tube (T2)- Tube Insertion Time (T2) (T1 + T2)- Measured from start of laryngoscopy to confirmation of successful tube placement Number of Attempts (Maximum 3)- Recorded per intubation episode until successful intubation or completion of a maximum of three attempts External Laryngeal Manipulation (ELM)- Assessed during the glottic exposure phase (T1) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To assess hemodynamic response in terms of heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure(MAP) & SpO2 during periprocedure time. To assess complications in terms of Airway trauma (lips, tooth, tongue)Timepoint: Baseline Just after Intubation 3min post intubation 5min post intubation | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDR. RAVIKUMAR M PARMAR
Shantabaa Medical College And General Hospital, Amreli
Outcome results
None listed