A study on dental implants with a special coating compared to regular implants

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF IMPLANT STABILITY WITH BISPHOSPHONATE-COATED AND UNCOATED IMPLANTS USING RESONANCE FREQUENCY ANALYSIS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY - Bisphosphonate Dental biomaterials Drug delivery Osseointegration

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/04/108089

Enrollment

Registered

2026-04-09

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecified

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Bisphosphonate coated implant: Implant placement with Bisphosphonate coated Control Intervention2: uncoated implant: implant without any bio-material coating

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged between 20 and 60 years Systemically healthy individuals Adequate bone volume to receive implants without the need for grafting Good oral hygiene status Willingness to participate and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of systemic bisphosphonate therapy Smokers and tobacco users Patients with metabolic bone diseases Uncontrolled systemic conditions such as diabetes mellitus Pregnant and lactating women 6. Presence of active periodontal or periapical infections.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the crestal bone changes and clinical parameters in bisphosphonate coated and uncoated implants using Radio frequency analysisTimepoint: Baseline 1 month 3 months 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Bibekanand Sah

Institute of dental sciences Bareilly

akkisingh014@gmail.com7007141450

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026