Skip to content

To compare propofol vs ketofol as an induction agent on hemodynamic profile in lumbar spine surgery under general anaesthesia

A study to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of propofol vs ketofol as an induction agent on haemodynamic profile in lumbar spine surgery under general anaesthesia randomized comparative study SMS Medical college Jaipur. - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/108081
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-04-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: Induction Agents: to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of propofol versus ketofol as an induction agent on the haemodynamic profile in lumbar spine surgery under general anaesthesi

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesiology SMS Medical college and attached HospitalsJaipur India
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients posted for elective spine surgery under general anaesthesia 2.Patients belonging to ASA grade I and II 3.Patients willing to consent 4.Patients of either sex,between the age group 20-60 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Obesity(BMI.30KG/m. 2.Difficukt laryngoscopy and intubation. 3.Pregnant and lactating females. 4.Patients with known hypersensitivity or contra-indications to study drugs. 5.Patients having cardiorespiratory dysfunction or renal,hepaticor metabolic disturbances, any chronic disease hypertension,diabetes mellitus, history of epilepsy and history of psychiatric illness. 6.Patient with a history of sore throat or upper respiratory tract infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Comparing the magnitude of haemodynamic variables(HR,SBP,DBP,MBP) in propofol versus ketofol study groups.Timepoint: Baseline,at 1 min. after induction, at 1 min. at 2,3,4,5,10,15,20,25,30 min.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Comparing the changes in rate pressure product and perfusion index in both study group. 2.Comparing the modified alderate score after extubation in both study groups. 3.Comparing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and shivering in both study groups.Timepoint: Baseline , at 1 min. after induction, at 1 min. at 2,3,4,5,10,15,20,25,30 min.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vijeta

SMS Medical College and attached Hospitals,Jaipur

sunitameena98@gmail.com9461290011

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026