Skip to content

Comparison of two procedures (rotational atherectomy and modified balloon angioplasty) for treating severely calcified coronary artery blockages in heart patients

Comparative Evaluation of Rotational Atherectomy versus Modified Balloon Angioplasty in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions A Single Center Retrospective Observational Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/108033
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-04-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I251- Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil Intervention3: Rotational Atherectomy: Rotational atherectomy assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in severely calcified coronary lesions Control

Sponsors

Rhythm Heart and Critical Care
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults aged 18 years and above who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for severely calcified coronary artery lesions Patients treated with either rotational atherectomy or modified balloon angioplasty Availability of complete clinical procedural and outcome data Patients treated at the study center during the defined study period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with incomplete or missing clinical procedural or outcome data Patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery involving the target vessel Patients presenting with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction requiring primary percutaneous coronary intervention Patients with non calcified or mildly calcified coronary lesions Patients with concomitant severe valvular heart disease requiring intervention Patients with known bleeding disorders or contraindications to antiplatelet therapy Patients lost to follow up or without documented outcomes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Procedural success defined as successful stent delivery and expansion with residual stenosis less than 20 percent and final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3 without in hospital major adverse cardiac eventsTimepoint: Assessed during index procedure and during hospital stay

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
In hospital major adverse cardiac events including death myocardial infarction target vessel revascularization and stent thrombosis, Angiographic success defined as residual stenosis less than 20 percent with adequate stent expansion, Periprocedural complications including coronary perforation dissection slow flow or no reflow and arrhythmias, Fluoroscopy time contrast volume and procedural duration, Length of hospital stayTimepoint: Assessed during index procedure and during hospital stay

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRakhshanda Khan

Rhythm Heart and Critical Care

harshawardhanramteke7@gmail.com8369525334

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026