Skip to content

Comparison of tDCS and rTMS for improving upper limb hand functions in ischemic stroke patients

Comparative effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Functions in Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/108010
Enrollment
72
Registered
2026-04-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I693- Sequelae of cerebral infarction

Interventions

Intervention1: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: 2 weeks protocol for 5 days each week total 10 session after 2 week followup Control Intervention1: Transcranial Direct Current stimulation

Sponsors

Divyanshi Tripathi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subacute stroke patients ( 2 weeks to 6 months) (Li Y et al., 2023 5. MMSE score upto 25 6. Cooperative and coherent, willing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Fugl Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), 2. Selective Control of the Upper Extremity Scale (SCUES)Timepoint: Baseline (T0), after 10 session Post treatment (T1),after two weeks followup (T2)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) (RMT, Amplitude, Latency)Timepoint: Baseline (T0), after 10 session Post treatment (T1),after two weeks followup (T2)

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDivyanshi Tripathi

Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences Saifai Etawah

physioneha04@gmail.com6389312368

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026