Skip to content

A clinical study to compare expenditures of personalized and standard dosing of opioid pain killers for pain relief in palliative (end of life) care in patients diagnosed with cancers

Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic-guided opioid dosing versus standard dosing, incorporating population pharmacokinetic modelling for pain relief in palliative care- a double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/107899
Enrollment
300
Registered
2026-04-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C00-D49- Neoplasms

Interventions

Intervention1: Pharmacogenetic-guided opioid dosing: In the intervention arm, the prescribing physician will receive the patient s pharmacogenetic report before initiating opioid therapy. The report i
UGT2B7, OPRM1, and COMT for tapentadol). Based on these results, along with clinical assessment, the physician will determine the initial dose and perform subsequent dose adjustments (titration) accor

Sponsors

Kasturba Medical College, Manipal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients (above or equal to 18 years) receiving palliative care for advanced or metastatic cancer will be eligible for inclusion. Patients who are being initiated on oral morphine or tapentadol therapy for cancer-related pain, as per the treating physician s clinical judgment, will be considered. Participants should have an expected survival of at least 3 months from the time of enrolment. Additionally, patients must be able to provide written informed consent either personally or through a legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with prior or ongoing use of strong opioids (such as morphine, tapentadol, fentanyl, methadone, or oxycodone) within the preceding 30 days will be excluded. Individuals with known hypersensitivity or contraindications to morphine or tapentadol will not be eligible. Patients with severe hepatic or renal impairment will also be excluded. Those with cognitive impairment or delirium that precludes reliable pain assessment will not be included. Pregnant or lactating women will be excluded. Additionally, patients currently enrolled in another interventional clinical trial will not be eligible for participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio on numeric rating scale for pain at 3rd monthTimepoint: 3 months (12 weeks)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Genotype results (of UGT2B7, OPRM1, ABCB1, COMT) in morphine and (UGT2B7, OPRM1, COMT for Tapentadol)Timepoint: At baseline (before first opioid dose).;Time to adequate pain control, defined as the duration from opioid initiation to achieving and maintaining an NRS score less than or equal to 3 for at least 24 hoursTimepoint: Assessed from baseline up to 6 months.;Incidence and severity of opioid-related adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, constipation, sedation, and neurotoxicity, assessed using standard clinical criteria.Timepoint: Assessed from 48-72hrs to 12 weeks.;Proportion of patients requiring opioid rotation or significant dose escalation due to inadequate analgesia or intolerable side effects.Timepoint: Assessed from week 1 to 12 weeks.;Patient satisfaction with pain management, measured using a Likert scaleTimepoint: Assessed on week 4 and 12.;Healthcare utilization, including the number of unscheduled hospital visits, emergency department visits, or re-admissions related to pain or opioid complications.Timepoint: Assessed from week 1 to 6 months.;Medication adherence, evaluated using pill counts.Timepoint: Assessed on week 1, 4 and 12.;Change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from baseline to study end, assessed using tools like EQ-5D-5L.Timepoint: Assessed at baseline, 12 weeks (end of follow-up), and 6 months (exploratory follow-up).;Net monetary benefit (NMB), calculated to support economic evaluation alongside ICER for decision-analytic modeling.Timepoint: Assessed at 12 weeks.;Ongoing opioid use, general health status, and quality of life and Documentation of Survival Status.Timepoint: Assessed at 6 months.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactJeffrey Pradeep Raj

Kasturba Medical College Manipal

jeffrey.raj@manipal.edu7904286189

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026