FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative Evaluation of different Restorative techniques and Bonding systems on the Marginal Adaptation of Cention-N Restorations: A SEM Study

Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation in Cention-N Restorations with Bulk versus Incremental Fill Techniques using Total Etch and Self Etch Adhesive Systems: A SEM Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/107764
Enrollment
68
Registered
2026-04-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K023- Arrested dental caries

Interventions

Intervention1: Cention-N Class-I restorations: Self Etch Adhesive System using both Bulk-fill and Incremental-fill Techniques, Total etch Adhesive System using Bulk-fill and Incremental-fill Technique

Sponsors

Dr Kajal Jaiswal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Non- carious primary molars. 2) Primary molars near to exfoliation. 3) Retained primary molars

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Primary molars showing any cracks or fractures. 2) Teeth with active carious lesions. 3) Hypoplastic or Hypocalcified primary teeth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Marginal adaptation of Cention-N restorations assessed as interfacial gap width (in micrometers) and scored using SEM analysis.Timepoint: Marginal adaptation will be assessed immediately after completion of restoration, thermocycling, and specimen preparation, at the time of scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Lumbini Pathivada

Rungta College of Dental Sciences and Research

drlumbinip@gmail.com7830008856

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026