Skip to content

A Study in Women with Uterine Problems Comparing Two Types of Camera-Based Uterine Surgery (Monopolar vs Bipolar) to See Which is Safer, More Effective, and Improves Quality of Life

Comparative Efficacy, Safety, Quality of Life, and Perioperative Hemodynamic Outcomes of Monopolar versus Bipolar Hysteroscopic Techniques for Specific Uterine Anomalies: A Retrospective Single-Center Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/107763
Enrollment
7500
Registered
2026-04-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N856- Intrauterine synechiae

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Bipolar Hysteroscopic Technique: Use of bipolar electrosurgical hysteroscopy with isotonic saline as distension medium for surgical management of uterine anomali

Sponsors

Rhythm Heart and Critical Care
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with incomplete or missing clinical, operative, or outcome data Patients without adequate follow-up or missing quality of life data (for QoL analysis) Duplicate or repeated patient records Patients undergoing hysteroscopic procedures for indications other than specified uterine anomalies Implausible or inconsistent clinical data

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with incomplete or missing clinical, operative, or outcome data Patients without adequate follow-up or missing quality of life data (for QoL analysis) Duplicate or repeated patient records Patients undergoing hysteroscopic procedures for indications other than specified uterine anomalies Implausible or inconsistent clinical data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in quality of life from baseline assessed using the validated SF-36 questionnaire in patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery (monopolar vs bipolar techniques)Timepoint: BASELINE, 4 WEEKS, 8 WEEKS

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Surgical efficacy measured by complete resection rate & need for repeat hysteroscopic procedureTimepoint: BASELINE, 4 WEEKS, 8 WEEKS

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactHarshawardhan Dhanraj Ramteke

Rhythm Heart and Critical Care

drmanishjuneja@gmail.com9825973745

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026