Skip to content

Comparing Three Different Surgical Approaches used for Total Knee Replacement

Comparison of Medial Parapatellar, Subvastus and Midvastus Approaches in Total Knee Replacement A Randomized Control Trial - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/107713
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-04-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Subvastus Approach for total knee replacement surgery: Subvastus Approach will be followed for Total Knee Replacement Surgery. In line with the mid-line skin incision, the first layer o

Sponsors

Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. A severe Knee Osteoarthritis patient undergoing total knee replacement 2. Those who are willing to participate in study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patient who will lose follow up 2. Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis 3. Ankylosed knee for Total Knee Replacement Surgery 4. Severe Varus deformity of more then 20 degrees

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Superior approach of Total Knee Replacement among Medial Parapatellar, Subvastus and Midvastus ApproachesTimepoint: Assessment will be done at 1 week, 6 weeks, 3,6 and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NilTimepoint: Nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Suhas Landge

Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research

suhasvlandge@gmail.com8007778654

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026