FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Accuracy of Infrazygomatic Mini-Implants Placed Using Computer-Guided Versus Manual Technique: A Split-Mouth CBCT Study

Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of infrazygomatic screw implants placed with a computer aided surgical guide and manually placed by an operator : A split mouth cone beam computed tomography study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/107474
Enrollment
11
Registered
2026-04-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z459- Encounter for adjustment and management of unspecified implanted device

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Manav Pradeep Karia Self
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 18-45 years Any Orthodontic case requiring skeletal anchorage for anterior retraction or whole arch distalization or posterior intrusion. Patient to be on 0.019 x 0.025 SS wire stage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Systemic disease or medications that affect bone biology Poor oral hygiene Gingival or periodontal disease Underlying periapical lesion Syndromic patient Mixed dentition patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Deviations observed between planned and final positions as planned and placed manually and using a surgical guideTimepoint: T0 (Baseline)-CBCT scan and intraoral scan and records T1 (After 1 week)- After placement for assessment of deviation.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactManav Pradeep Karia

Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital , Navi Mumbai

drparaggangurde@gmail.com9892580848

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026