FindTrial
Sign In

How Well Two Different Dental Post Systems Perform and Stay in Place in Severely Damaged Front Primary Teeth A Clinical Study

Comparative Evaluation of clinical performance and retention of a conventional fibre post with Uniblock post and core system in mutilated primary anterior teeth An in vivo study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/107425
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-04-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional fibre post and core: Evaluation of clinical performance and retention of a Conventional fibre post and core in mutiliated primary anterior teeth. Control Intervention1: Uni

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with mutilated anterior teeth with loss of crown structure Teeth with root length more than 8mm Teeth having minimum 1mm of intact, supra-gingival and non-carious crown structure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with any systemic disease Patients with any Psychological and Neurological disorder Patients with Frankl s behavioural scale of 1 and 2 Patients having Deep bite

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Uniblock posts will have better retention as compared to conventional glass fibre post for rehabilitation of mutilated primary anterior teeth.Timepoint: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Parental SatisfactionTimepoint: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShubham Dole

Dr. D Y Patil Dental College and Hospital Pimpri

nilesh.rathi@dpu.edu.in9960100010

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026