FindTrial
Sign In

A Study Comparing Two Different Types of Dental Implants for Replacing Missing Front Teeth.

Effectiveness of basal cortical screw implants verses endo-osseous implants in Rehabilitation of anterior edentulous alveolar ridges : Single blind Randomised Controlled trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/04/107344
Enrollment
32
Registered
2026-04-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecified Health Condition 2: K03- Other diseases of hard tissues ofteeth

Interventions

Intervention1: BCS IMPLANT: BCS (Basal Cortical Screw) implants are a specific type of dental implant designed for immediate loading, meaning you can often get your final teeth within 72 hours to a we

Sponsors

DrKaranjit Singh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients aged 18 60 years requiring anterior alveolar ridge rehabilitation. 2. Class I or Class II ridge defects (Siebert classification) or fresh extraction socket indicated for immediate or delayed implant insertion. 3. Minimum bone height of 8 mm and width of 4 mm in the anterior ridge. 4. Systemically healthy (ASA Class I or II). 5. Good oral hygiene maintenance. 6. Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. History of radiation therapy to the head and neck region. 2. Severe systemic conditions (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression). 3. Active periodontal disease or oral infections. 4. Smoking more than 10 cigarettes/day. 5. Pregnancy or breastfeeding 6.patient not fit for minor surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. To evaluate and compare crestal bone level changes . 2. To evaluate and compare the primary and secondary stability of implants Timepoint: Baseline: Radiographic and clinical evaluation, primary stability assessment. 1 Week: Postoperative recovery (pain/swelling). 6 Months: Radiographic bone levels, secondary stability, surgical outcomes, patient satisfaction. 12 Months: Final evaluation of all parameters.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
3. To assess the surgical outcomes of both implant systems based on Buser s criteria. 4. To evaluate patient satisfaction with the implant rehabilitation process. 5. Implant Survival rate Timepoint: Baseline: Radiographic & clinical evaluation, primary stability assessment. 1 Week: Postoperative recovery (pain/swelling). 6 Months: Radiographic bone levels, secondary stability, surgical outcomes, patient satisfaction. 12 Months: Final evaluation of all parameters.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrKaranjit Singh

Government Dental college and hospital Nagpur

varshamanekar67@gmail.com9823077626

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026