FindTrial
Sign In

Assessing speed of tooth movement by using two different laser light treatments in patients with irregurally placed teeth and their effect on jaw bone

Comparative evaluation of photobiomodulation by two wavelengths on canine retraction rate and RANKL/OPG expression in gingival crevicular fluid: a randomized control trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/107187
Enrollment
12
Registered
2026-03-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M264- Malocclusion, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Laser photobiomodulation: In the patients undergoing canine retraction with 1st premolar extraction indication, photobiomodulation will be done using diode laser of 650nm wavelength for

Sponsors

Dr Thatiparthi Susmitha Reddy
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Maxillary first premolar extraction cases for orthodontic treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients on long-term medication 2.TMJ disorders 3.Multiple missing teeth 4.Impacted teeth except third molar 5.Periodontally compromised teeth 6.Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the rate of canine retraction following the application of photobiomodulation by two different wavelengths of 650nm and 980nmTimepoint: Baseline, 7, 14, 21, 30 and 60 days—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare the levels of RANKL and OPG in GCF during canine retraction in both laser groups using ELISA testTimepoint: Baseline, 2, 7, 14, 21, 30 and 60 days—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr K Anil Kumar

Vishnu Dental College

padmapriyacv@vdc.edu.in9440712238

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026