Skip to content

Parents Attitudes and Perceptions Toward Two Different Protective Devices Used to Manage Uncooperative Children During Dental Treatment

Comparative evaluation of attitude and perception of the caretaker for the use of two different protective apparatus in managing uncooperative pediatric patients during dental treatment - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/107045
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-03-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Papoose Board: Papoose board will be used as a physical restraint & local anesthesia will be administered by the operator for the required procedure. After the procedure, evaluation of

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with age group 4-7 years of age. Patients with Frankl s behaviour rating scale 1 & 2. Patient requiring local anesthesia for dental treatment for two or more procedures. Patients with informed parental consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient with special health care needs. Patient with any debilitating disease. Patients with Frankl s behaviour rating scale 3 & 4. Patient who is a known allergic to local anesthetic agent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Parental attitude and perception about the use of protective stabilization deviceTimepoint: baseline and after intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Vital parameters such as Oxygen saturation, heart rateTimepoint: baseline & after treatment

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Shubham Dole
nilesh.rathi@dpu.edu.in9960100010

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026