FindTrial
Sign In

Diagnostic efficiency of CBCT comparing with RVG in primary molars

Unveiling the hidden roots: A Diagnostic comparison of 2D and 3D imaging in primary molars - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/106972
Enrollment
10
Registered
2026-03-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K038- Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: RVG: 2D diagnostic radiograph is taken to observe the resorption of root in primary molars Intervention2: NIL: NIL Control Intervention1: CBCT: 3D diagnostic radiograph is taken to obse

Sponsors

Dr Kodimela Jyoti Priiya
Lead Sponsor
Dr Saurabh Tiwari
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Radiograph with clear images of primary molars with visible Cementoenamel junction (CEJ) 2 The resorption of mesial and distal roots (symmetrical or if one of the roots was more resorbed 3 Absence of pulp treatment and Stainless steel crowns

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Systemic conditions affecting bone/tooth development 2 Previous endodontic treatment or pulpotomy 3 Acute facial infection or trismus 4 History of CBCT within the prior 6 months for the same region 5 Teeth with gross loss of root structure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in the amount of root resorption seen in primary molars between CBCT and RVGTimepoint: Baseline—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic efficacyTimepoint: Baseline—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Saurabh Tiwari

Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital

drsaurabhtiwari297@gmail.com07742591007

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026