comparison of two types of tooth restorations in root canal treated back teeth using biomimetic approach.

One year comparative evaluation of indirect composite versus glass ceramic as a cuspal coverage restoration in endodontically treated posterior teeth using biomimetic protocol-A double-blinded randomised clinical study. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/03/106790

Enrollment

Registered

2026-03-23

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K041- Necrosis of pulp

Interventions

Intervention1: Endodontically treated posterior teeth restored using biomimetic protocols receiving indirect composite as a cuspal coverage restoration: Indirect composite restorations will be fabri

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Systemically healthy patients of 18-16 years of age. 2. Posterior teeth with clinical diagnosis of apical periodontitis or pulp necrosis with minimum two red flags as per biomimetic structural evaluation will be included. 3. posterior teeth with radiographic findings revealing coronal radiolucency involving enamel, dentin and pulp, with periapical radiolucency on RVG with periapical index (PAI) score less than or equal to 3 will be included. 4.A written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and only those patients ready to sign the consent form will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: i. Patients with poor oral hygiene, severe periodontal disease, endo- perio lesion, open apices, internal/external resorption, and fractured roots will be excluded. ii. Patients with developmental anomaly or pathology or congenital defects, with poor prognosis, mal-aligned and heavy bruxism resulting in lost physiologic contour, will be excluded. iii. Teeth indicated for re-root canal treatment will be excluded from the study. iv. Teeth not in functional occlusion and absence of an adjacent or opposing tooth will be excluded. v. Teeth with subgingival loss of tooth structure rendering them non- restorable will be excluded. vi. Pregnant and lactating mothers will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the clinical performance of indirect composite restoration and glass ceramic as a cuspal coverage restoration based on Revised FDI criteria in endodontically treated posterior teeth using biomimetic approach.Timepoint: At baseline, 6 and 12 months after placement of indirect cuspal coverage restoration.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nimisha Shah

K M Shah Dental College and Hospital

nshah7873@gmail.com9998994299

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026