Skip to content

Better healing for dental implants: with or without i-PRF?

Evaluation of conventionally placed dental implants with and without application of iPRF A comparative study - i PRF, ISQ

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/106759
Enrollment
12
Registered
2026-03-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Injectable platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF): Patients will receive dental implants, and i-PRF will be injected into the osteotomy site and re-evaluation done after 3 months Control Interve

Sponsors

Blessy Angel Kommina
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.systemically healthy patients. 2.Bilaterally partially edentuolous for mandibular premolars and molars region. 3.Adequate bone for conventional placement of implant.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Uncontrolled diabetes 2.Poor patient compliance 3.Patient exhibiting parafunctional habits (bruxism). 4.Pregnant and lactating women. 5.Smokers and alcoholics Active or severe inflammation /infection at implant site

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Bone density Bone volume crestal bone levelTimepoint: baseline 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
implant stability quotientTimepoint: 3 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mohammad Sheema Tasneem

Sree Sai Dental college and Research Institute

sheema.tasneem@gmail.com9985546868

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026