Skip to content

A Randomised Double-Blind Comparative Study of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Using 0.2% Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine versus 0.2% Levobupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine in Adult Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery

A RANDAMISED DOUBLE BLIND COMPARATIVE STUDY ON ULTRASOUND GUIDED ERECTOR SPINE PLANE BLOCK USING 0.2% ROPIVICAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMEDINE VERSES 0.2% LEVOBUPIVICAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMEDINE IN ADULT PATIENTS UNDERGOING SPINE SURGERIES - ESPLR

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/106649
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-03-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G998- Other specified disorders of nervous system in diseases classified elsewhere

Interventions

Intervention1: ERECTOR SPINE PLANE BLOCK: FASCIAL PLANE BLOCK GIVEN ABOVE TRANSVERSE PROCESS 20ml of 0.2% ropivicaine with 25mcg of dexmedatomedine vs 0.2% levobupivicaine with 25 mcg of dexmedantomed

Sponsors

shri balaji institute of medical sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1&2 BMI LESS THEN 25 ELECTIVE LUMBAR SPINE SURGERIES

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA 3&4 , CARDIAC ILLNESSES, COAGULOPATHY, ANTICOAGULANTS, HISTORY OF ALLERGY, INFECTION AT SITE OF BLOCK, NON CONCENTING PATIENTS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
TIME OF FIRST RESUE OPIOID ANALGESIATimepoint: BASELINE , 3O MINUTES,1 HOUR, 2 HOUR, 6 HOUR 12 HOUR POST SURGERY

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NRS SCORE, TOTAL ANALGESIACONSUMPTION, HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING,SIDE EFFECTSTimepoint: 8-10 week

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR ANISHA NAGARIA

Shri balaji institute of medical science

dranishanagaria@gmail.com9205011225

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026