FindTrial
Sign In

a comparative study of hand tracing and computer generated tracing among participants undergoing orthodontic intervention

comparative evaluation of measurements by manual versus digital software generated cephalometric tracing - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/106624
Enrollment
150
Registered
2026-03-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R688- Other general symptoms and signs

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil Intervention3: Digital software generated cephalometric tracing: Digital software generated cephalometric tracing using nemoceph and autoCeph software a

Sponsors

Kalka Dental college
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects seeking orthodontic treatment whose records included cephalometric Xrays Age group 18 to 45 years Patients with normal growth and development

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient having previous history of trauma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the accuracy of manual and computer software generated cephalometric measurementsTimepoint: At Baseline (T0) collection of cephalometric images (pre-tracing) first Repeat at (T1) after time duration of 4 Weeks to assess the reproducibility of measurement over the time—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShipra Nagar

Kalka Dental College

shipray@yahoo.com9971822949

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026