Skip to content

Comparing Two Treatments To Improve Arm Function And Daily Life In People Recovering From a Stroke

"Effectiveness Of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy Versus Motor Relearning Programme On Motor Function And Quality Of Life In Hemiplegic Upper Extremity Post Sub Acute Stroke -A Randomized control trial" - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/106530
Enrollment
54
Registered
2026-03-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I639- Cerebral infarction, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Constraint Induced movement therapy: This group will undergo constraint induced movement therapy with conventional therapy . The cimt therapy includes set of fifteen task oriented func

Sponsors

Narayana Hrudayalaya Institute of Physiotherapy
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants diagnosed with either ischemic or hemorrhagic with Sub-acute stroke . Participants were those with hemiplegic conditions due to stroke, restricted Glenohumeral and elbow joint mobility, and limited hand and wrist function on the affected side. Ischemic brain injury or intra cerebral haemorrhage confirmed by CT scan or MRI. Motor Activity Log scores more than 2. Mini Mental Status Examination score greater than 24. Participants with Hemiplegic upper extremity had functional Level of greater than 20 degrees of wrist extension and greater than 10 Degrees of extension of all digits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with stroke onset Exceeding 20 months, glenohumeral joint subluxation, severe cognitive defects, aphasia, or recurrent cerebral strokes. Behaviorally disturbed or other psychiatric, visual disturbances or visual neglect. Orthopaedic or arthritic condition interfering with Upper extremity function, severe cardiopulmonary disease. Recurrent stroke or any other neurological deficit that compromises with their ability to comply with the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fugal Meyer Assessment- upper extremityTimepoint: pre intervention at baseline and after 4 weeeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Motor Activity Log -30 itemsTimepoint: pre intervention at baseline and after 4 weeeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rajendra kachhwaha

Narayana Hrudayala Institute Of Physiotherapy

rajendra.kachhwahaa@hrudayalayafoundation.org95299822777

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026