Skip to content

Comparing Quality of vision in patients receiving Penta focal and trifocal Intraocular Lens for Enhanced near, Intermediate, distant vision after cataract surgery

A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative, Post-marketing clinical study to assess and compare the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of two Intraocular Lenses - pentafocal and trifocal IOLs following bilateral implantation. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/106488
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-03-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H251- Age-related nuclear cataract

Interventions

Intervention1: Intensity Pentafocal IOL: The patient undergoing cataract surgery via phacoemulsification is implanted with a hydrophobic pentafocal intraocular lens. Control Intervention1: PanOptix Tr

Sponsors

None
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 18 year or greater 2. Patients with bilateral age related cataracts, require bilateral cataract phacoemulsification combined Intraocular Lens implantation; 3. Patients with axial length of 22 - 24.5mm 4. Normal corneas with less than 1.00 D of regular corneal astigmatism 5. Post-operative best corrected visual acuity projected to be 0.3 log MAR or lower 6. Fundus visualization is possible 7. Absence of retinal or optic nerve diseases

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Previous intraocular or corneal surgery that may affect refraction accuracy or visual acuity 2. Capsule or zonular abnormalities that may affect postoperative centration or tilt of the lens 3. History or evidence of any ocular disease that may affect visual acuity 4. Rubella cataract 5. Amblyopia 6. Any other ocular condition that may predispose a subject to future complications or contraindicate implantation of the Intensity SL lens 7. Pupil abnormalities 8. Patients with pupil diameter greater than 4 mm in photopic conditions 9. Pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the course of the trial 10. Allergy or intolerance to required study medications 11. Subjects participating in a concurrent clinical trial or if they have participated in an ophthalmology clinical trial within the last 30 days 12. Traumatic cataract 13. Irregular astigmatism 14. Instability of keratometry or biometry measurements 15. Patients receiving chloroquine treatment 16. Patient having Microphthalmia 17. Patient having Chronic Uveitis 18. Patient suffering from Corneal dystrophy or endothelial insufficiency. 19. Patient having active ocular diseases (active diabetic retinopathy, uncontrolled glaucoma)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) @ 6 m (20 Foot) 2. Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (UIVA) @ 66 cm 3. Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity (UNVA) @ 40 cmTimepoint: Post-Operative: Month 1, Month 6 & Month 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfaction and quality of vision between the two IOLs, using McAlindens. spherical aberration of intraocular lenses is measured using wavefront aberrometry. Visual performance by De-Focus curve.Timepoint: Post-Operative: Month 1, Month 6 & Month 12

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactProf A Heber

Dr. Agarwals Eye Hospital

drlionalraj@dragarwal.com918754411261

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026