Skip to content

Comparing plaque index, patient Comfort and Dentist Choice between Guided Biofilm Therapy and Ultrasonic Piezo Scaling

Comparison of Patient Perceptions and Practitioner Preferences in Guided Biofilm Therapy Versus Ultrasonic Piezo Scaling: A Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/106311
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-03-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K050- Acute gingivitis

Interventions

Intervention1: scaling: guided biofilm therapy and ultrasonic scaling Intervention2: guided biofilm therapy: Subgingival and supragingival biofilm removal using air polishing and guided biofilm thera

Sponsors

GSL DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants eligible for the study were adults aged 18 to 60 years with a minimum of 20 natural teeth. The teeth included in the study were required to be free from dental caries, abrasion, erosion, or any other structural defects. Only systemically healthy individuals diagnosed with Stage I or Stage II periodontitis were included. Additionally, participants were required to have no caries or abrasions present in the teeth selected for evaluation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The exclusion criteria included individuals with systemic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, or cancer, and those suffering from respiratory diseases including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. Participants who had used antibiotics within three months prior to the start of the study were also excluded. In addition, pregnant or lactating women, individuals with a known allergy to chlorhexidine or erythritol, and smokers consuming more than 10 cigarettes per day were not eligible for inclusion. Furthermore, individuals who were unwilling to undergo the proposed treatment were excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Plaque index and questionnaires assessing comfort, pain, sensitivity, efficiency, and satisfaction levels ranges from 0-10 after treatmentTimepoint: BASELINE

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kata Sai Sruthi

GSL DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL

anu3267@gmail.com9985313267

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026