FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Learning Versus Traditional Bedside Teaching in Orthopedic Training for Interns in terms of Knowledge gain, skill acquisition and learners confidence.

Comparative analysis of Simulation-Based Learning versus Bedside Learning in Orthopaedics Among Undergraduate Intern Medical Students - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/106250
Enrollment
72
Registered
2026-03-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Simulation based learning (SBL) : Conducted in skills/lab or designated area. Skills covered will be- Clinical examination of the knee joint on models. Application of above elbow plaste

Sponsors

Govind Kumar Gupta
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: MBBS interns currently posted in orthopaedics during the study period. Students who provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: MBBS interns with prior formal exposure to structured orthopaedic simulation ourses/workshops (beyond routine posting) to avoid bias from previous SBL training. MBBS interns who are absent for any of the planned teaching or assessment sessions. MBBS interns unwilling to participate or refusing consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Knowledge GainTimepoint: Baseline, 16 weeks.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Skill AcquisitionTimepoint: Baseline, 16 weeks.;Learner Satisfaction/ConfidenceTimepoint: post 4 months teaching intervention—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGovind Kumar Gupta

Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences

gkgupta1975@yahoo.co.in7979014287

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026