FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between two endoscopic management for enlarged prostate with urinary symptoms.

Comparison of Functional outcomes following Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation versus Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to Prostatomegaly: A Randomized Controlled Trial - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/106233
Enrollment
90
Registered
2026-03-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N401- Benign prostatic hyperplasia withlower urinary tract symptoms

Interventions

Intervention1: BIPOLAR TURP OF PROSTATE: Resection of prostate via urethra using bipolar working element. Control Intervention1: BIPOLAR ENUCLEATION OF PROSTATE: Enucleation of prostate via urethra us

Sponsors

AIIMS Patna
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Age more than 50 years and less than 80 years. 2.Patients with moderate and severe LUTS(IPSS more than 19) due to prostatomegaly. 3.Patient with BOO (Q-max less than 10 ml/s or PVR more than 100 ML or 30 percents of bladder capacity) with prostatomegaly. 4.Patients willing to provide written informed consent and comply with follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Clinical or histological evidence of carcinoma prostate. 2.Previous prostate or urethral surgery. 3.Urethral stricture disease or neurogenic bladder. 4.Refusal to participate in the study. 5.Patients unfit for surgery. 6.Active UTI 7.Patient on anticoagulants.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the Q-max between the two groups at 3 months.Timepoint: To compare the Q-max between the two groups at 3 months.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the functional outcomes (IPSS and PVR) at 3 months. To compare quality of life parameters (QOL score/IIEF 5 scores) between both groups. To compare operative time. To compare catheterization time and hospital stay between the two procedures. To compare complication rates, including intraoperative and postoperative complications (as per Clavien Dindo classification). Timepoint: 3 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Saket Singh

AIIMS Patna

docsaket89@gmail.com9971467796

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026