FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Bone Changes Around Guided Dental Implants Using Different bone flattening methods

Comparative evaluation of marginal bone loss around guided implants placed with and without bone flattening drill protocols: A randomized clinical study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/106172
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-03-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Guided implant placed with bone flattening drill: After guide placement and soft-tissue punching, A bone-flattening drill with a short, wide tip and multiple cutting edges will then be

Sponsors

Dr Mansi Sharma
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Single missing mandibular posterior tooth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Need for grafting. controlled systemic diseases. Smokers / alcohol or drug abuse. Pregnant or lactating women. Previous radiation to head/neck. Active infection or periodontitis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Marginal bone loss will be assessed using standardized intraoral periapical radiographs (IOPA) at three intervals.Timepoint: Baseline, after prosthetic delivery, and after 12 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Hasan sarfaraz

Yenepoya dental college

drhsarfaraz@gmail.com9845083778

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026