Skip to content

Comparing Two Ways of Port Placement in Gallbladder Surgery: Which Is Less Painful?

Effect of Ultrasound Guided vs Conventional Port Placement on Postoperative Port-Site Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/105854
Enrollment
72
Registered
2026-03-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K800- Calculus of gallbladder with acutecholecystitis Health Condition 2: K801- Calculus of gallbladder with othercholecystitis Health Condition 3: K802- Calculus of gallbladder without cholecystitis Health Condition 4: K808- Other cholelithiasis

Interventions

Intervention1: Ultrasound Guided Port Placement: Patients allocated to the intervention arm will receive ultrasound-guided port placement. After randomization preoperative ultrasound mapping of the ab

Sponsors

Dr Divya Mishra
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Adult patients aged between 18 and 60 years 2) American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I to III 3) Scheduled for elective LC 4) Patients who provide informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic procedures will be excluded. Individuals with a history of previous upper abdominal surgery or trauma will be excluded. Patients with known coagulopathies, defined as an International Normalized Ratio greater than 1.5 or a platelet count below 50,000, will be excluded. Pregnant females will be excluded. Patients with morbid obesity, defined as a body mass index equal to or greater than 35 kilograms per square meter, will be excluded. Patients with cognitive impairment or inability to provide informed consent will be excluded. Patients who are unable to comprehend or use the Visual Analogue Scale for pain assessment will be excluded. Patients with local skin infection at the proposed port sites will not be enrolled. Cases requiring open conversion during surgery will be excluded. Patients on long term medications that may alter pain perception, such as antidepressants, aspirin, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, or lithium, will be excluded. Patients with neuropathic disorders, such as diabetic neuropathy, will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Severity of Port-Site PainTimepoint: Pain severity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale at 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours postoperatively, and will be compared with patients who receive conventional port placement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Analgesic Requirement for Port Site PainTimepoint: As a direct consequence of lower pain scores, it is expected that the ultrasound guided group will require a lower total dose of postoperative analgesic medication within the first 48 hours.;Port-Site ComplicationsTimepoint: To compare port site complications, including hematoma, infection, bleeding, and seroma, up to postoperative day 30.;Time to first ambulationTimepoint: With less pain and fewer complications, patients in the ultrasound guided group are expected to achieve their first successful ambulation earlier after surgery.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ravi Gupta

All India Institute of Medical Sciences Gorakhpur

ravikgmc2004@gmail.com9453302264

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026