Skip to content

A study comparing two chemical peel treatments (lactic acid peel and glycolic acid peel) along with oral tranexamic acid for the treatment of facial melasma.

A comparative study on the effectiveness and safety of 92 % lactic acid peel in combination with oral tranexamic acid 250 mg twice daily versus 35 % glycolic acid peel in combination with oral tranexamic acid 250 mg twice daily therapy for the treatment of facial melasma: a randomised controll trial in tertiary care teaching hospital Haldwani - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/105746
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-03-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L988- Other specified disorders of the skin and subcutaneous tissue

Interventions

Intervention1: 92% Lactic Acid Peel + Oral Tranexamic Acid: Patients will receive 92% lactic acid chemical peel applied to facial melasma lesions at 3-week intervals for a total of 6 sessions, along w

Sponsors

Dr Pdiangty Giri Mawlong
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of either sex of age more than 18 years and less than 50 years, with melasma of epidermal variety with melasma areas and severity index score more than 10 who had not taken treatment for melasma for the last 4 weeks were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant or lactating women. Patients with known hypersensitivity to lactic acid, glycolic acid, or tranexamic acid. Patients with history of liver disease or hepatitis B/C infection. Patients with active bacterial, viral, or fungal skin infection on the face. Patients with history of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation. Women taking oral contraceptive pills or hormone replacement therapy. Patients with severe systemic illness or malignancy. Presence of active dermatoses on the face such as atopic dermatitis, eczema, or seborrheic dermatitis. Patients currently using oral or topical retinoids. Patients taking anticoagulants or drugs affecting coagulation (e.g., warfarin, aspirin, NSAIDs). Patients with history of thromboembolic disorders including deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Patients with history of photosensitivity disorders. Patients with history of adverse effects related to tranexamic acid such as abdominal bloating, headache, tinnitus, or menstrual irregularities. Patients unwilling to comply with follow-up or expecting complete cure without maintenance therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score from baseline between the two treatment groups.Timepoint: Baseline (Week 0) Week 3 Week 6 Week 9 Week 12 Week 15 Week 18 (End of treatment)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Melasma Quality of Life (MELASQOL) score To assess improvement in melasma-related quality of life following treatment. Clinical photographic assessment of pigmentation improvement Standardized digital facial photographs to document clinical response.Timepoint: For Melasqol Baseline (Week 0) Week 18 (End of treatment) For photographic assessment Baseline Week 3 Week 6 Week 9 Week 12 Week 15 Week 18

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pdiangty Giri Mawlong

Government Medical College, Haldwani

pdiangtygmawlong29@gmail.com8571818569

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026