FindTrial
Sign In

COMPARISON OF ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF 2 ULTRASOUND GUIDED BLOCKS GIVEN AROUND KNEE JOINT TO PATIENTS UNDERGOING KNEE SURGERIES

COMPARISON OF ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED ADDUCTOR CANAL BLOCK VERSUS ADDUCTOR CANAL BLOCK WITH IPACK BLOCK FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING KNEE SURGERIES - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/105679
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-03-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Adductor canal block with iPACK block: Patient will recieve both adductor canal block and iPACK block Total duration of study 6 months Control Intervention1: Adductor canal block: Pati

Sponsors

Sri siddhartha medical college Tumkur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients posted for knee surgeries belonging ASA Grade 1, 2 and 3 Patients aged 18-80 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refusal to participate in the study Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics. Preexisting peripheral neuropathy. Infection near site of injection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the duration of analgesia between the 2 groupsTimepoint: 24 hours—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To estimate the total consumption of rescue analgesics. Timepoint: 24 hours;To compare the adverse effects between the 2 groups. Timepoint: 24 hours—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr SAMVEDA S G

Sri siddhartha medical college

samveda311@gmail.com9341239804

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026