Skip to content

Topical treatment with and without oral betamethasone mini-pulse regimens in progressive vitiligo : a randomized clinical trial

Comparison of two betamethasone oral mini pulse regimens plus topicals versus topicals alone in rapidly progressive non-segmental vitiligo: a randomized three-arm clinical trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/03/105670
Enrollment
75
Registered
2026-03-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L00-L99- Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue

Interventions

Intervention1: betamethasone oral mini pulse (2.5 mg twice a week) with topical treatment: Corticosteroids like betamethasone are used in achieving stabilization of disease arrest in vitiligo. Betamet
Fluocinolone acetonide 0.1% (once daily)for vitiligo patches on other sites of the body. Control Intervention1: betamethasone oral mini pulse (5 mg twice a week) with topical treatment: Corticosteroid
Fluocinolone acetonide 0.1% for vitiligo patches on other sites of the body. Control Intervention2: Topical treatment alone: Topical therapy for vitiligo in this study would i

Sponsors

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: This study will include patients between the ages of 18 and 65 with rapidly progressive vitiligo, which will be taken as the development of more than 5 new lesions in the past 1 month, or more than 15 new lesions in the past 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: This study will exclude patients who have segmental vitiligo or stable/slowly progressive disease, pregnant and lactating females, patients who have known contraindications to corticosteroid use (such active infection, uncontrolled diabetes/hypertension), patients who are on phototherapy/systemic treatment for the last 4 weeks, and patients who are unwilling to adhere to monthly follow-up visits for 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients with disease arrest (no new lesion and no progression of pre-existing patches).Timepoint: 12 weeks and 24 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients with VDIS15 score corresponding to moderately improved which implies a score of more than 1 VDIS60 score corresponding to much improved for which to a score of more than 1.5 will be considered. Timepoint: Baseline, 12 weeks & 24 weeks;Mean number of new vitiligo lesions during the study period (intra- & inter group comparison) Timepoint: Baseline, 12 weeks & 24 weeks;Proportion of patients in different VIDA score categories (inter-group comparison). Timepoint: Baseline, 12 weeks & 24 weeks;Repigmentation outcomes: Mean percentage reduction in the TVASI & FVASI scores, proportion of patients with TVASI 50 & FVASI 75, & proportion of patients with different percentage repigmentation categories sites on Likert scale Timepoint: Baseline, 12 weeks & 24 weeks;Quality of life outcomes: Mean VIS-22 scores (intra- & inter group comparison), proportion of patients with a change of VIS-22 score more than 5 points (inter-group comparison), & proportion of patients with different GQ responses (inter-group comparison). Timepoint: Baseline, 12 weeks & 24 weeks;Proportion of patients with side effects Timepoint: Baseline, 12 weeks & 24 weeks;Longitudinal evolution of VSAS score during the study period (intra- & inter group comparison) & longitudinal evolution of VDAS & VDIS (15 & 60) scores during the study period (intra- & inter group comparison). Timepoint: Baseline, 12 weeks & 24 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVishal Gupta

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

almavikram10@gmail.com9643126976

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026