FindTrial
Sign In

A study to compare two minimally invasive techniques for groin hernia repair

Outcomes of TEP Repair by Conventional vs 555 Manish Technique for Groin Hernia Repair - Randomized Control Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/105068
Enrollment
70
Registered
2026-02-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K402- Bilateral inguinal hernia, withoutobstruction or gangrene Health Condition 2: K409- Unilateral inguinal hernia, without obstruction or gangrene

Interventions

Intervention1: TEP repair for groin hernia: TEP repair done by two techniques - 555 Manish technique and Conventional TEP repair using Hasson trocar Intervention2: 555 Manish technique for Total Extra

Sponsors

Dr Abha Chugh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with groin hernia who are fit for TEP repair

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients not willing to consent to take part in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Post-operative pain at the infraumbilical port site using VAS scoreTimepoint: 12 hours, 24 hours, day 7 and 30 after the surgery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Intraoperative time taken in seconds from point of incision to reaching upto Preperitoneal spaceTimepoint: Incision to entering Preperitoneal space;Post-operative infraumbilical port site induration in millimetres using a plastic scaleTimepoint: Day 7 after surgery;Post-operative cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction using VAS scoreTimepoint: Day 30 of surgery—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Abha Chugh

Sir Ganga Ram Hospital

drmanishgupta2002@yahoo.com9811671157

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026