Compare the difference in operating time in mandibular parasymphysis fracture fixation when using newly designed Z plates instead of conventional miniplates

Comparison of operating time and ease of adaptation between Z-shaped vs Conventional Miniplates among Patients undergoing Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fracture Fixation-A Randomized control trial - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/02/105066

Enrollment

Registered

2026-02-27

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M279- Disease of jaws, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Z SHAPED MINIPLATES: TWO FOUR HOLE MINIPLATES JOINED BY AN OBLIQUE ARM Control Intervention1: CONVENTIONAL MINIPLATES: CONVENTIONAL MINIPLATES USED REGULARLY EITHER TWO HOLW OR FOUR HOL

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: PATIENTS WITH MANDIBULAR PARASYMPHYSIS FRACTURE REQUIRING OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: PATIENTS WITH SEVERE CO MORBIDITIES PATIENTS WITH COMMUNITED AND INFECTED FRACTURES PATIENTS WITH KNOWN METAL ALLERGIES

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Reduction in introperative time for fracture fixationTimepoint: intraoperative time	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
ease of adaptation of platesTimepoint: during intraoperative time	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrBala Subramanian P

Government Dental college,Kottayam

georgephilip2000@gmail.com9003237191

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026