Skip to content

A Study to Compare Task-Oriented Training With and Without Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Arm Function in People With chronic Stroke

Effects of task oriented training with or without propioceptive neuromuscular facilitaion replication technique on upper extremity motor function in chronic ischemic stroke subjects: a randomized clinical trial - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/105025
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-02-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I634- Cerebral infarction due to embolism of cerebral arteries Health Condition 2: I633- Cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of cerebral arteries

Interventions

Intervention1: Task Oriented Training and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular facilitation replication Technique and conventional physiotherapy: The experimental group will receive task-oriented training com

Sponsors

nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Subjects with Unilateral Chronic Ischemic Stroke, with middle cerebral artery involvement confirmed with MRI or CT scan. 2.Both genders, having age range between 40-65 years. 3.Subject with Brunnstrom Voluntary Motor Control of Upper extremity more than or equal to 3. 4.Subjects with good trunk control and able to sit independently. 5.Subjects with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score more than or equal to 24.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Subjects other than cerebral stroke e.g Cerebellar, pontine or brain stem stroke. 2.Subjects with hemorrhagic or recurrent stroke. 3.Subjects with other brain disorders like subarachnoid hemorrhage, encephalitis, epilepsy, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or brain injury. 4.Subjects with heart failure symptoms, uncontrolled hypertension, or unstable angina. 5.Subjects having cognitive dysfunction, psychiatric disorder or not able to follow commands. 6.Subjects with musculoskeletal dysfunction in upper extremity like fracture, tendon, or muscle injury.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fugl Meyer Assessment of upper extremity (FMA-UE).Timepoint: Measurements will be taken at two time points: at baseline and after completion of 20 intervention sessions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Modified Functional Reach Test (MFRT)Timepoint: Measurements will be taken at two time points: at baseline and after completion of 20 intervention sessions. ;Box and Block Test (BBT)Timepoint: Measurements will be taken at two time points: at baseline and after completion of 20 intervention sessions. ;Motricity Index (MI)Timepoint: Measurements will be taken at two time points: at baseline and after completion of 20 intervention sessions.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Manju Vats Phd

Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya National Institute for Persons with Physical Disabilities (Divyangjan)

manju.vats@rediffmail.com9891182228

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026