Skip to content

Comparison of half metal cap (metal onlay) and half zirconia cap(zirconia onlay) on rootcanal treated back teeth

Comparison of metal onlay and zirconia onlay on root canal treated first and second molars with single proximal defect - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/104929
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-02-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K041- Necrosis of pulp Health Condition 2: K085- Unsatisfactory restoration of tooth

Interventions

Intervention1: zirconia onlay: Zirconia onlays on root canal treated first and second molars with single proximal defect with follow up of 18 months Control Intervention1: metal onlay: Metal onlays o

Sponsors

Nilaja Sharon W
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age between 18-70 Opposing agonist teeth present Root canal treated maxillary and mandibular first and second molars with single proximal defect

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient not willing for recall visits Periodontally compromised patients Short clinical crowns

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
compare the survival rate of zirconia onlays over metal onlays in root canal treated first and second molars with single proximal defectTimepoint: 18 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Compare the success rate of zirconia onlays over metal onlays in root canal treated first and second molars with single proximal defectTimepoint: 18 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr I Anand Sherwood

CSI college of dental sciences and research

anand.sherwood@gmail.com9443805150

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026