Which Helps paralysis Patients Use Their Hand Better Robotic Glove or Mirror Therapy?

Effect of Soft robotic Glove versus Mirror Therapy along with Conventional Physiotherapy on Manual Dexterity, Grip Strength and manual ability among Stroke Individuals - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/02/104749

Enrollment

Registered

2026-02-25

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I699- Sequelae of unspecified cerebrovascular diseases

Interventions

Intervention1: Effect of Soft robotic Glove versus Mirror Therapy along with Conventional Physiotherapy on Manual Dexterity, Grip Strength and manual ability among Stroke Individuals: CONVENTIONAL WIT

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Post stroke hemiplegics aged 18 and 65 years Fugl Meyer Assessment score 30 to 50 Mini Mental State Examination score more than 21

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with bilateral stroke. Stroke patient with any other diagnosed Neurological and Psychosomatic condition. Stroke patient with shoulder or arm contracture/pain less than 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Purdue peg board Fugl- Meyer Assessment Hand held Dynamometer ABHILHAND questionnaireTimepoint: T0- Baseline assessment done pre intervention T1- Assessment done post intervention	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Saburi Goliwar PT

MAEERS PHYSIOTHERAPY COLLEGE TALEGAON DABHADE

goliwarsaburi@gmail.com7083630629

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026