FindTrial
Sign In

In patients who need dental implants, does placing implants using computer guidance compared to the traditional manual method give better accuracy and stability

Evaluation of implant placement accuracy and stability using conventional and computer-guided technique. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/104531
Enrollment
18
Registered
2026-02-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Computer guided implant placement using 3D printed surgical gide: Flapless implant placement will be performed after evaluation of the available bone height and width. A tissue punch wi

Sponsors

Karri Lakshmi Prasanna
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adults aged 18 65 years with partial edentulism requiring dental implants. 2. D2 & D3 type of bone. 3. Patients falling under ASA I or II. 4. Patients providing informed consent and willing for follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. History of head-and-neck radiotherapy or chemotherapy. 2. Habitual smokers or substance abuse. 3. Pregnant or lactating women. 4. Patients with severe atrophic ridges.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical outcome-Implant Stability Radiological outcome Implant Placement Accuracy Marginal Bone Loss Timepoint: Immediate post op, 3 month and 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr L Krishna Prasad

Sibar Institute Of Dental Sciences

dr_lkp@sids.ac.in9848123244

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026