None listed
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: Smart Burs and Ceramic burs: Comparing efficiency, efficacy and pain perception while caries excavation.
Control Intervention1: Diamond bur: Comparing efficiency, efficacy and pain perc
Sponsors
Sanchita Ramesh Govari
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthy children of age 5-12 years who were willing to take part in the study. 2. Children with positive or definitely positive behavior according to Frankel s behavior rating scale. 3. Maxillary and Mandibular primary molars with occurrence of carious lesion into dentin on occlusal surface. 4. Asymptomatic carious lesions with distinct dentin involvement verified by radiograph. 5. Carious tooth without any clinical symptom with clear dentin involvement confirmed radiographically.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Noncooperative child. 2. Grossly decayed teeth. 3. Presence of any clinical/radiographic sign and symptom. 4. Presence of developmental defects in primary molar. 5. Children with underlying systemic disease.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Ceramic burs would be more acceptable than polymer burs and conventional diamond point burs for minimally invasive caries excavation. Timepoint: At the baseline | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| NILTimepoint: NIL | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDr Shantanu R Choudhari
Government Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad
Outcome results
None listed