FindTrial
Sign In

Study comparing the Epifaith syringe versus the conventional LOR syringe for the identification of the epidural space

A Study to compare the Epifaith syringe versus the conventional LOR syringe for the identification of the epidural space - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/104057
Enrollment
44
Registered
2026-02-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil Intervention3: Nil: Nil Intervention4: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. 18 years and older 2. Surgery requiring epidural anesthesia or analgesia 3. ASA Physical Status 1 to 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the efficacies of the EpiFaith syringe and the conventional syringe for the successful localization of the epidural spaceTimepoint: time required for epidural localization—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
a. Time to identify the epidural space b. Duration of the epidural space localizationNumber of attempts c. Number of occurrences of false positive d. The distance from the skin to the epidural space Timepoint: time to identify the epidural space—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrRitu Baloda

Pt B.D.Sharma PGIMS

ritubaloda@gmail.com8427666673

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026