Immediate effects of different ankle treatments on performance and movement in volleyball athletes with chronic ankle instability

Immediate Effects of Mobilization with Movement (MWM) and Taping Versus Sham Treatment on Functional Performance and Proximal Lower Limb Biomechanics in Volleyball Athletes with Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Sham Controlled Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/02/104044

Enrollment

Registered

2026-02-16

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Mobilisation with Movement (MWM) with taping: i want to check the immediate effects of Mobilisation with movement (MWM) of the talocrural joint of with taping of ankle joint on hop perf

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. History of more than or equal to 2 ankle sprains with ongoing instability symptoms 2. CAIT score less than or equal to 25 3. Able to perform Functional tasks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Acute ankle injury within the last 3 months 2. Grade III sprain or Ankle fracture 3. History of lower limb surgery for 1 year 4. Ongoing rehabilitation for 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Horizontal hop test (single-leg hop test for Distance)Timepoint: Participants will perform a maximal forward hop on the injured leg, and the distance (in centimeters) from toe-off to landing will be measured using a standard measuring tape.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Knee valgus angle 2. Pelvic DropTimepoint: Through Kinovea software	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Deepak kumar pradhan PT

Abhinav Bindra Spots Medicine and research Institute

deepakpradhan@absmari.com8792738499

Outcome results