Skip to content

Evaluation of Outcomes After Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Surgery in Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Patients

Ambispective Audit of Patients Undergoing Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Germ Cell Tumor - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/103918
Enrollment
350
Registered
2026-02-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C629- Malignant neoplasm of testis, unspecified whether descended or undescended

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil Intervention3: Nil: Nil Intervention4: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Tata Memorial Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Histologically or clinically (based on tumor marker diagnosis) proven TGCT. Patients 15 years of age and above, registered in TMH + ACTREC. Patients with testicular germ cell tumor who have undergone RPLND.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who have undergone RPLND for non-germ cell tumors. Patients who have not had the first 3 monthly follow up with Tata Memorial Hospital and ACTREC.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the Overall Survival (OS) of patients who have undergone RPLND for TGCT at Tata Memorial Centre.Timepoint: Date of treatment (RPLND) to death (due to any cause) or last follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Disease Free Survival (DFS) Cancer Specific Survival (CSS) 30-day Perioperative Complications (Clavien-Dindo) Incidence of scrotal violation and surgery for undescended testis Need for salvage or desperation RPLND Indications and surgical outcome of redo RPLND Outcome of patients with extra retroperitoneal disease Histopathological concordance (RPLND vs Orchiectomy / Extra-RPLND) Utility of serum tumor markers (AFP, BHCG, LDH) during surveillance Outcome of antegrade ejaculation (nerve-sparing RPLND) Operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay Comparison of robotic vs open RPLND outcomesTimepoint: Assessed during perioperative period (up to 30 days post-surgery) and during follow-up up to last follow-up (prospective cohort followed for minimum 2 years post-RPLND).

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Gagan Prakash

Tata Memorial Hospital,Parel

gagan2311@gmail.com9833722711

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026