Skip to content

Improving Walking Ability in Stroke Patients: Which is Better Eccentric (Lowering) or Concentric (Lifting) Leg Exercises

Effect of eccentric versus concentric strengthening on functional mobility in subacute stroke patients - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/103815
Enrollment
34
Registered
2026-02-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I679- Cerebrovascular disease, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Eccentric Strengthening: The strengthening program focuses on key lower limb muscles using weight cuffs and progressive resistance. For quadriceps, seated knee extensions are performed

Sponsors

Farseen Mohammed P
Lead Sponsor
Prof Lourdhuraj I
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: First ever haemorrhagic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI neuroimaging Stroke in the subacute phase from one month to six months after onset Demonstrable lower limb functional impairment including impaired gait, balance or mobility Modified Rankin Scale score of 2 to 3 Modified Ashworth Scale score of 2 or less in the lower limb Brunnstrom Stages of Recovery 3 to 5 for the lower limb Montreal Cognitive Assessment score greater than 24 using validated Kannada and Malayalam versions as appropriate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Other neurological disorders including Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis and peripheral neuropathy Orthopaedic or musculoskeletal conditions limiting participation in the intervention Severe or uncontrolled systemic illness including cardiac disease, uncontrolled hypertension or recent myocardial infarction within the previous three months Severe cognitive dysfunction with Montreal Cognitive Assessment score less than 24 or severe aphasia precluding comprehension of instructions Bilateral stroke involvement Concurrent enrolment in another structured lower limb rehabilitation programme

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Timepoint: Baseline (Pre-intervention), End of 4 weeks (Post-intervention)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT)Timepoint: Baseline (Pre-intervention), End of 4 weeks (Post-intervention)

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactProf Lourdhuraj I

Yenepoya Deemed to be University

lourdhuraj@yenepoya.edu.in9940529169

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026