Skip to content

Comparison of hydrogen peroxide lactoferrin zinc lactate mouthwash and povidone iodine mouthwash on healing after periodontal surgery

Comparative evaluation of mouthwash containing 0.1% Hydrogen Peroxide, 0.05% lactoferrin and 0.14% zinc lactate with 2% povidone iodine on clinical healing outcomes following periodontal surgery A Randomised controlled trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/103760
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-02-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Hydrogen peroxide lactoferrin zinc lactate mouthwash VS Povidone iodine mouthwash: Group A patients will receive mouthwash containing 0 point 1 percent hydrogen peroxide 0 point 05 perc

Sponsors

GROUP PHARMACEUTICALS
Lead Sponsor
MYSELF
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 35 to 55 years Systemically healthy patients Diagnosed with stage three grade B periodontitis Completed nonsurgical periodontal therapy at least three months before surgery Indicated for periodontal flap surgery without regenerative procedures Non smokers Patients willing to participate and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with systemic diseases affecting wound healing such as diabetes mellitus or severe anemia Patients who used systemic antibiotics in last six months Patients taking medications affecting healing such as corticosteroids or cytotoxic drugs Smokers Pregnant or breastfeeding women Patients requiring regenerative periodontal surgery Patients not willing to follow study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Healing outcome measured using the Healing Index (Landry et al 1988) Tissue colour Bleeding on palpation Granulation tissue Incision margin epithelialization Presence of suppurationTimepoint: BASELINE AND 21DAYS

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient-reported pain discomfort measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Evaluated at Baseline Evaluated at 21 days post-operativelyTimepoint: BASELINE AND 21DAYS

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR SUJAY J

AJ INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES

purushothamsahana@gmail.com9591293604

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026