Marginal fit and clinical performance of two differently fabricated provisional crowns are assessed

Marginal fit and clinical performance of milled vs 3D printed single tooth-supported provisional restorations in the aesthetic zone A randomized clinical trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/02/103717

Enrollment

Registered

2026-02-12

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K038- Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: provisional restoration fabricated by 3D printing: provisional restoration fabricated by 3D printing using methacrylate resin Total duration would be 6 months Control Intervention1: pro

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. 2. 3. Root canal treated tooth requiring a full coverage restoration Vital teeth requiring full coverage restoration with adequate coronal structure Maxillary and/or mandibular teeth in the aesthetic zone; i.e. 2nd Premolar to 2nd Premolar 4. Age: 16-50 years 5. Patients with good oral hygiene 6. Patients willing to sign written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
marginal fitTimepoint: baseline and after 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
clinical performanceTimepoint: baseline & after 6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPuneeti Angurala

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research

docsudhirbhandari@gmail.com8146887725

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026