Skip to content

Comparison of two video-guided techniques for nasal breathing tube placement in patients undergoing jaw and facial surgery, assessing first-atempt success.

Comparison of the use of Video Laryngoscope vs Video Laryngoscope aided with Flexible scope as an intubation aid for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery- A Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/103671
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-02-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S024- Fracture of malar, maxillary and zygoma bones Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Video laryngoscope combined with flexible scope intubation: Nasotracheal intubation will be attempted under guidance of video laryngoscope combined with flexible scope. After induction

Sponsors

Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients scheduled for maxillofacial surgeries requiring general anaesthesia with nasotracheal intubation 2. Adult patients aged 18 to 60 years undergoing nasotracheal intubation for maxillofacial surgery 3. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) status 1, 2 or 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with restricted mouth opening 2.Patients planned for awake fibreoptic intubation. 3.Patients having any contraindications to nasotracheal intubation- Suspected epiglottitis Midface instability Coagulopathy Suspected basilar skull fracture

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the success rate of first attempt of nasotracheal intubation between VL-FS Group and VL-Only Group VL-FS Group- Video laryngoscope combined with Flexible scope intubation VL-Only Group- Video laryngoscope intubation only Timepoint: First, baseline vitals will be recorded for the patient after shifting to OT. Second after first attempt successful intubation measured from insertion of device till confirmation by capnography. Third, if first attempt failed and more attempts were required and if there was any change in technique. All assessments will be done intra-operative.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.To compare the number of attempts for successful nasotracheal intubation between VL-FS group & VL-Only group. 2.To compare the time to successful intubation which is time taken from passing blade to cuff inflation of endotracheal tube between VL-FS group & VL-Only group. 3.To compare the ease of intubation between VL-FS group & VL-Only group. Timepoint: All secondary outcomes will be assessed intraoperatively during the intubation procedure immediately after induction of anesthesia.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Srinivasan S

Jawaharlal institute of postgraduate medical education and research

srinianaes@yahoo.co.in96226493045

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026