FindTrial
Sign In

Effect of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization versus Segmental Stabilization on Strength, Balance, and Power in Overhead Athletes with Upper Cross Syndrome

Comparison Of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization vs Segmental Stabilization On Isometric Strength, Balance And Power of Overhead Athletes with Upper Cross Syndrome - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/103500
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-02-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization: DNS exercises, which focus on core stabilization and strengthening, given in 3 phases, for 6 weeks Intervention2: Segmental Stabilization group: Exe

Sponsors

Dr Mohit Wadhwani
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: UCS score more than 7 having 2 years of regular training or playing experience athletes playing in district or above competitive level

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: H/O fracture of upper limb in past 2 months any spine surgery in past 2 months athletes diagnosed with any psychiatric condition or those who decline to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Isometric strength, Balance, PowerTimepoint: Baseline, 6 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMohit Wadhwani

Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies

mohitw818@gmail.com8264050002

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026