Skip to content

Comparative analysis of semen parameters in fresh and frozen semen samples of subfertile men

Comparative Analysis of Semen parameters in raw and cryopreserved semen in Subfertile Men - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/103401
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-02-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N469- Male infertility, unspecified

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Raw (fresh) semen sample analysis: Fresh semen samples obtained from subfertile men will be analysed prior to cryopreservation. Semen parameters including sperm concentration, m

Sponsors

Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age: Men within the reproductive age range typically 18 to 50 years to represent the population of interest. 2. Abstinence Period: Men adhering to a specific abstinence period e.g., 2 to 7 days before semen collection to ensure a standard sperm concentration. 3. Non azoospermic on baseline semen analysis. 4. Willingness to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Age: Men outside the defined reproductive age range. 2. Recent Illness or Fever: Men who have experienced illness or fever in the weeks leading up to the study, as this could temporarily affect sperm parameters. Varicocele, cryptorchidism, testicular trauma, gonadal disease, Genital tract infection, scrotal disease. 3. Systemic Illness: Men with systemic illnesses or chronic medical conditions that may affect spermatogenesis or sperm motility. 4. Recent Medication Use: Men taking medications known to impact sperm motility e.g., certain antibiotics, chemotherapy drugs within a specified timeframe. 5. Inability to Provide an Adequate Sample: Men are unable to provide an adequate semen sample for analysis due to various reasons, such as difficulty with sample collection. Serologically infected patients. 6. Those who refused to give consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of semen parameters sperm concentration, motility, morphology, and vitality between raw and post-thaw cryopreserved semen samples in subfertile menTimepoint: Baseline fresh semen analysis prior to cryopreservation and post-thaw analysis after completion of cryopreservation procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NilTimepoint: Nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nidhi Sharma S

Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS)

nidhisharma.smc@saveetha.com9445560392

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026