FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of infection rate between 2 different ports in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Comparison between Post Operative Port Site Infection following retrieval of Gall Bladder from Epigastric port versus Umbilical port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/103015
Enrollment
44
Registered
2026-02-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with ASA grade I and II with symptomatic cholelithiasis requiring elective laparoscopy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with any bleeding disorders, any anticoagulant or anti platelet therapy, with abnormal coagulation profile, INR more than 1.5 or platelets less 100000/uL, Immunocompromised patients, Patients requiring conversion to open cholecystectomy, empyema Gall Bladder, Emphysematous cholecystitis, Gall Bladder malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Port site infections after retrieval of Gall Bladder in Laparoscopic CholecystectomyTimepoint: Post Operative day 1,7,30—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Port site bleeding after retrieval of Gall Bladder in Laparoscopic CholecystectomyTimepoint: Post operative day 1, 2—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSusmita B R

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi

anilbellad@gmail.com9448112599

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026